Mammograms – Yes, No, Maybe So?

by Suzanne Somers 11/20/2009 9:00:00 AM
Earlier this year I interviewed Dr. Russell Blaylock, an oncologist, brain surgeon, and neuroscientist, for my book, KNOCKOUT: Interviews with Doctors Who Are Curing Cancer and How to Prevent Getting it in the First Place. One of the topics we discussed was the risk of radiation exposure from yearly mammograms–a procedure designed to PROTECT women with early detection of breast cancer. Blaylock states the radiation we receive from yearly mammograms actually increases our risk. “The most conservative estimate is 1 percent per year. Another estimate is 3 percent a year. Some radiologists say it’s even higher than that.” (KNOCKOUT, p. 150)

If we were good little rule followers, and started having our mammograms at 40, that means by the time we are 50 we may have increased our risk of breast cancer by as much as 30%! Of course, when I printed this information in my book, I was deemed a heretic for quoting Blaylock because this information could “damage women’s health” by confusing them about the importance of early detection from mammograms.

Fast forward to a few days ago and we have the release of the results from the U.S. Preventive Task Force, conducted by 16 independent scientific heavyweights, who concur with the information from Dr. Blaylock. The task force is now stating that women should NOT have yearly mammograms until the age of 50, and only every two years. They say the scientific research shows the risks outweigh the benefits. For the complete report, see Annals of Internal Medicine.

Then on Wednesday, Kathleen Sebelius, U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary, invalidated the independent report, along with the American Cancer Society, stating the scientific research is incorrect. Hmm. How many radiologists have invested in the technology for yearly mammograms? How much revenue will be lost if we eliminate this yearly appointment?

On the other side of the issue, there are legitimate cases of breast cancer for women under 50! What are the alternatives if we still want early detection, without the increased risk? Blaylock states, “If I were a woman, I’d never have a mammogram. The best thing is to get screened with an MRI. Thermogram is also good because we know tumors are hot and benign lesions tend to be cool.” (KNOCKOUT, p. 152)

Our next push will be making sure insurance covers breast MRI and thermogram. I continue to put myself out there as a dart board for the medical community. Their “darts” are sharp, “Don’t listen to her quackery. She’s a stupid actress. Since when does Suzanne Somers have a medical degree?” I am not a doctor, but I happen to have access to some of the most incredible medical minds in the world–and I print their opinions to make sure they are heard. So may I just relish in the validation of the material I have put out in KNOCKOUT? And may I just be a little immature for a moment and say, “I TOLD YOU SO!” Ah, that felt good.

Sincerely,

Suzanne Somers

For more information go to SuzanneSomers.com

Share:
EmailFacebookDigg It!DZone It!StumbleUponTechnoratiRedditDel.icio.usNewsVine

Currently rated 2.1 by 79 people

  • Currently 2.113924/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Tags: ,

Cancer

E-mail | Kick it! | DZone it! | del.icio.us
Permalink | Comments (21) | Post RSSRSS comment feed

Swine Flu Vaccination – As Hot as Tickle Me Elmo

by Suzanne Somers 11/12/2009 6:44:00 AM

With mounting fear of H1N1, I have been asked numerous times for my opinion on the Swine Flu vaccination.  Should I get it?  Should I vaccinate my kids?  Is it safe?  Is it tested?  What are the side effects???  There is fear of this flu.  There is fear of the vaccination.  It’s a NEW vaccination – do I want to be in the test pool???  The FDA says it’s safe and the CDC recommends it.  My grandchildren have been sent home with permission slips so they can receive it at school.  So it’s time to do a little homework.  Do we just blindly follow the suggestions we see on TV and from the CDC?  Or do we dig a little deeper?  The choice is yours.  I am not a doctor or a scientist.  I am a layperson.  In my current book, KNOCKOUT Interviews with Doctors Who are Curing Cancer and How to Prevent Getting It in the First Place, I interview numerous doctors and professionals using everything from conventional treatments, to integrative, to alternative.  I do not give advice – my purpose is to give options so you can make your own decision about your treatment.  I have taken the same tact with the H1N1 vaccine. 

People are lining up to receive the vaccination, and it’s being doled out slowly as the manufacturers try to “keep up with demand”.  Reminds me a bit of “Tickle Me Elmo” – will there be enough to go around???  The shortage makes it that much more in demand as we see lines around the block with eager customers hoping there will be enough for them.  Mounting fear.  Mounting demand. Gotta get mine.  

Here are two opposing opinions on the vaccination.  DO RESEARCH.  MAKE YOUR OWN DECISION.   

#1:

The Center for Disease Control has published information on the Swine Flu and the H1N1 vaccination.   To research their findings, click here http://www.cdc.gov/h1n1flu/background.htm

#2:

On the other side of the argument, please read this information by Dr. Russell Blaylock.  I interviewed him in my last two books.  He is one of the most highly regarded neuroscientists in the country.  He believes we are being scared into taking an ineffective vaccination with dangerous side effects, especially for pregnant women and their unborn babies (citing medical studies showing a risk for an increase in seizures, autism, schizophrenia, and neurological developmental disorders).  Read his article and listen to his interview with Dr. Mercola at Mercola.com.  He has been studying this flu since the outbreak in 1976 and following this current strain since its inception in March.

Health Alert from Dr. Russell Blaylock Concerning Swine Flu
Dr. Russell Blaylock
Swine Flu – One of the Most Massive Cover-Ups in American History

http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2009/11/03/What-We-Have-Learned-About-the-Great-Swine-Flu-Pandemic.aspx

 

And make sure to watch the CBS 60 Minutes piece from 1976 that only aired one time and was never shown again.  It is now being released on the internet after 20 years.  While the current vaccine is completely different than the one given at that time it makes you think twice about accepting information as truth before doing thorough research. 

 

CBS 60 Minutes Swine Flu 1976 & Propaganda

http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x9mh9f_swine-flu-1976-propaganda_webcam

 


Share:
EmailFacebookDigg It!DZone It!StumbleUponTechnoratiRedditDel.icio.usNewsVine

Currently rated 3.5 by 22 people

  • Currently 3.545454/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Tags:

Health and Hormones

E-mail | Kick it! | DZone it! | del.icio.us
Permalink | Comments (17) | Post RSSRSS comment feed

Powered by BlogEngine.NET 1.4.5.0

About Suzanne

Suzanne Somers is one of America’s most popular and beloved personalities. In a multifaceted career, she has achieved extraordinary success as an actress, New York Times bestselling author, entrepreneur, singer, comedienne, and lecturer. Suzanne has authored 20 books, including eleven New York Times bestsellers, as well as five of which were #1 New York Times bestsellers. There are currently more than 10 million copies of her books in print. As one of America’s most informed and dedicated health care advocates, Suzanne has been acknowledged for her leading role in bringing information on today’s groundbreaking anti-aging medical protocols, preventive care, long-term health, and hormone replacement therapies to women and men across the country.

Click here for Suzanne's full biography.